Разбор речи аратаров

Today we can see the growth of interest in the field of active social groups, first of all politicians. Language and politics are closely connected because political system can`t exist without communication. Politicians use language as means of giving information, making lows, convincing people. The majority of actions in politics are mostly linguistic actions, so that’s special feature of politics. Some scientists consider language as a means of reflection of political actions but as a part of political field. A lot of scientists devote their works to studying political texts, for example, E.

---

С сервисом Work5 написание докторской диссертации в Краснодаре станет проще.

---

.V. Budaeva, A.P. Chudinov , etc. The relevance of the work is justified by scarce knowledge about political texts, so additional explorations are needed. The aim of the work is devoted to research in political speech (taking speech of V.V. Zhyrinovsky as an example). The objects of the research are the following: • Study and analyze the relevant literature • Find the data of research • Make conclusions about the research

As a result we should say that political text can be considered as a verbal communications in particular socio- political context, in which speaker and listener have their roles according to the participation in the political life , which is a subject of the communication. With the help of political text political information (without all political process are impossible) circulates. Special features of the political text are the following: the image of the author, informational content, the factor of addressee, intentionality, estimation, conventionality, emotiveness, modality, intertextuality, social-cultural content, ideological characters, form and means of communication. This research can be used to study English and Russian languages.

1. Baranov A.N., Kazakevich, E. G. Parliamentary debates: traditions and innovations, Modern political language. – M.: Znanie, 1991- 235 p. 2. Chernyavskaya V.E. The discourse of power and the power of discourse: problems of speech influence.- M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2006.- 134 p. 3. Chudinov A. P. (2007). Politcal linguistics: manual (2nd edition).- M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2004.- 290 p. 4. Issers O.S. Speech impact. M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2011. - 224 p. 5. Issers O.S. Tactics of finding out information // Direct and indirect communication: Sat. scientific tr. Saratov, Publishing House of the State University Center “College”, 2003. P. 231–239. 6. Karasik V.V. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. –M.: Gnosis, 2004- 189 p. 7. Karasik V.V. (2000). About types of discourse, Language personality: institutional and personal discourse . Volgograd: Peremena, - 2000- 326 p. 8. Khalatyan A.B. Communication strategies and tactics of modern pre-election discourse in Russia and the USA. Bulletin of PSLU. 2010. No. 1. P. 159–164. 9. Mikhaleva O.L. Political discourse. The specifics of manipulative influence. M.: Librokom, 2009.- 256 p 10. Parshin, P. B. Concept of an idio-political discourse and methodological bases of political linguistics. M.: Librokom, 1999.- 270 p.